The Bourne Supremacy is the second of a trilogy. From this trilogy, I’ve seen the third (check a post some days ago), and now I’ve seen the second. Well, this is not the more natural order to see the movies. But things sometime are not ordered as we expect…
It is normal to say that the second, or third movies, get worst. For instance, look to Shrek. The first was brilliant, the second was OK, and I didn’t see the third yet, but people say bad things about it.
In this case, I would say that the third movie is quite better than this one. No, this is not a bad movie. But I enjoyed a lot more the third. Now, this raises me a question: do we enjoy the first movies because they are the first and directors are with fresh ideas, or do we enjoy the first movie we watch because our brain works some more to remember the identity of characters, and to glue a story? No, I am not a psychologist, but this question just got through my mind.
Back to the movie, go watch it :P